Process
We separate two jobs that are usually tangled together: designing the test, and verifying the answers. Each is done by whoever does it best.
Scenario design is a distinct craft — separate from subject-matter expertise. We construct discriminating traps, near-miss distractors, and unambiguous scoring rules: items calibrated so strong models score well above weak ones, and every gold answer has exactly one defensible conclusion. This is all we do, and we do it at volume.
Then every item is independently reviewed and verified by a licensed CPA — matched to the pack's domain — before anything ships. The reviewer edits, corrects, and substantively validates the work; the stamp is real, not ceremonial. Domain errors get caught here, by someone qualified to catch them.
Why it works
The pipeline, plainly stated.
Expert time is expensive and scarce. We do the heavy authoring — hundreds of scenarios, gold answers, and rubrics — so credentialed reviewers spend their hours on judgment, not drafting.
Nothing ships unverified. Every item passes independent professional review, and items that don't hold up get fixed or cut. What you receive has survived contact with a real expert.
Everything is synthetic and invented for evaluation purposes. Your models haven't seen it, nobody's private data is in it, and there are no licensing entanglements.
Benchmarks go stale — once models have seen a set, it stops differentiating them. The pipeline builds fresh packs on demand: harder items, new sub-domains, new verticals.
Request the 20-scenario taster — format, difficulty, and rubric design, ready to review.
Request the taster